From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Aug 17 5: 9:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD514CD4; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 05:09:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from markab (markab [128.130.111.33]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA29293; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:08:45 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:08:44 +0200 (MET DST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Bruce Albrecht Cc: Alan Cox , emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wine and SMP In-Reply-To: <14241.46122.663977.293230@celery.zuhause.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Bruce Albrecht wrote: > There should be a note added to the wine port to say that it doesn't > work for SMP kernels in 3.2. I guess it's time to start following > -current again. This is very bad. I'm constantly facing the choice of running -STABLE and incomplete Linux and Windows emulation or having to go -CURRENT. In the former case users will complain about the inability to run legacy stuff or stuff where there is not FreeBSD version, in the later case they (probably) will complain about lack of stability. It's bad enough that I have to recompile the kernel to support Wine, but not supporting Wine on current hardware with official releases is really a bad thing[TM]. Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message