From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 11 09:41:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB604106564A for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621818FC15 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.11] (helo=1.mx.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1Manr3-0007Bx-89; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:41:17 +0200 Received: from tc13b.t.pppool.de ([89.55.193.59]:57988 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 1.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #93) id 1Manr2-0003cG-WD; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:41:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:41:16 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090811114116.71e72ebb@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <78871850@bb.ipt.ru> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> <00339944@bb.ipt.ru> <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> <78871850@bb.ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate-ID: 149285::1249983677-00001366-3CBC3890/0-0/0-0 Cc: Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:41:19 -0000 On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:53:57 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:18:50 +0200 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:22:47PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > > > Well, as for fc4 ports, Fedora Core 4 is unmaintained for > > > a long time and there is no hope to get an updated version. > > > The same seems to happen with f8 port. > > > This is annoying cause it means default linux_base under 7.X is a "no > > way" in future: I mean when some linux apps will be updated people using > > 7.X and default linux_base may face up to issues. And on another hand I > > understood that some missing sysctl calls etc. prevents the switch to > > f10 under 7.X. So what is the good solution for the future? > > As Sean has said 7-STABLE is in a good state to use -f10- ports. > However, even Fedora 10 distros have not been updated so far... > If you need a workstation with modern linuxulator consider trying > 8.x. Write here what is not working and we'll try to overcome it. > Well, I'm running an 8-current AMD64 installation. I installed nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_4 and linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32 today and now it's back to core dump city again. Older versions of these ports worked. I have compat.linux32.maxssiz=4194304 in /etc/sysctl.conf, which used to be all that was required for flash to work :( I've now deleted both ports. I can live without flash - just a report of my experience. --- Gary Jennejohn