From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 16:20:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5716A439; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.telix.ru (mail.telix.ru [81.222.232.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2593443D7E; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:20:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (mail [81.222.232.5]) by mail.telix.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7D0515F4; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:20:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail.telix.ru ([81.222.232.5]) by localhost (mail.telix.ru [81.222.232.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77680-08; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:20:14 +0300 (MSK) Received: from desktop.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (user-172.pool-12.telix.ru [85.249.12.172]) by mail.telix.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3017512AA; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:20:14 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:20:16 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.11.02) Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <863261238.20051108192016@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Edwin Mons In-Reply-To: <4370CEC0.6080000@ik.nu> References: <4370CEC0.6080000@ik.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at telix.ru Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port devel/subversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:20:23 -0000 Hello Edwin, Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 7:13:52 PM, you wrote: EM> Why did you update subversion to a pre-release (that is: unstable) EM> version of 1.3.0, while 1.2.3 is the current recommended version by the EM> subversion team? People (like me) are counting on a stable subversion EM> client/server in the ports tree... Perhaps the 1.3.0rc? can move to a EM> seperate port, for instance devel/subversion-devel... I'd really like EM> to see a stable, released version in the main port... Because: (a) This RC is fixed many bugs, which was reported to me as port's maintainer. Backport patches when release will be in month or less is not what I want to do. (b) Some gcc maintainers need this version, because gcc project uses subversion now and REQUIRES 1.3.0-rc1 or later. (c) We need to test this version on FreeBSD BEFORE release, because sibversion's developers never does tests on FreeBSD themselfs. And, last, but not least: (d) You is not enforced to update. 1.2.3_3 is Ok for you? Don't updgrade port -- it is simple! And about `subversion-devel': 95% of time there is not any alpha, beata or rc versions of subversion project. RC presents for less than a month and even nto for every release, so 95% of time `devel' port will be equal to `simple' one. -- Best regards, Lev mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org