From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 18:15:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD58516A401 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E9043D49 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9471A4DF5; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:15:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B40B451A83; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:15:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:15:18 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060314181518.GA40455@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060314175300.GA39040@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060314181027.90340.qmail@web30306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060314181302.GA40425@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060314181302.GA40425@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Ensel Sharon Subject: Re: do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:15:19 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:13:02PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:10:27AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote: > > > > them) - just the quick question: are there any known issues / > > > > suspicions / hunches / lore about bad things happening when > > > > snapshots are combined with quotas ? > > >=20 > > > Yes - I've even posted as such on this very list in the past few > > > days, so I don't know why you're asking again. > > >=20 > > Hmm... > >=20 > > When was it? I just found some messages (mostly about not further > > specified bugs) > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-March/author.html > >=20 > > But nothing about quota... > >=20 > > Would be astonishing if snapshots have side effects on > > quota-feature-use, I think... >=20 > Since in 6.0 a) snapshots have bugs, and b) quotas have bugs, it > should be hardly surprising to you that snapshots have bugs with > quotas. The moral of the story is: if you care about either of these features then please test 6.1-beta4 in case there are further unresolved problems :-) Kris --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEFwg2Wry0BWjoQKURAg++AJwN3YsxHV+/L46OPlo7avwU2iS5RQCfYVe1 GEA/aOw4Q4gBio6iUCsJPWw= =CfZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--