Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 1996 14:13:24 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
To:        Brian Handy <handy@condor.physics.montana.edu>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: silo overflow
Message-ID:  <199602012113.OAA21098@rocky.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960201140603.1415B-100000@condor.physics.montana.edu>
References:  <199602011827.LAA20509@rocky.sri.MT.net> <Pine.BSF.3.91.960201140603.1415B-100000@condor.physics.montana.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Can someone tell me what this line out of my syslog means?
> > > 
> > > Jan 27 15:04:24 condor /kernel: sio0: 2 more silo overflows (total 2)
> > > Jan 27 15:04:32 condor /kernel: sio0: 1 more silo overflow (total 3)
> > 
> > It means the hardware couldn't keep up with the serial load.  I started
> > seeing that recently on my -stable box at home after I upgraded the
> > kernel, and I *never* saw it before.  I'm not sure why, but it might be
> > related to the SPL changes Peter/Bruce made.  (Just guessing).
> > 
> > It's mostly harmless, but annoying since the only load I have is *ONE*
> > SLIP connection running at 115K on a 486/66 which is mostly unloaded
> > when I get these messages.
> 
> Heh...hmmm.  Allow me to take this a step further.  You're saying my 
> serial mouse is overloading the system? :-)

Uhh, yep.  Why, I don't know, see above.  Bruce would be the one to
answer why a mouse could overload the system.  Did you update the kernel
recently to cause this to happen?



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602012113.OAA21098>