From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 01:14:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A3D3F89 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 01:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B1463B for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 01:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 42E535F2358A; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:14:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:14:50 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching from ports to pkg -- mailman group mismatch Message-ID: <20141205011450.GD11940@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141204045849.GA4247@home.parts-unknown.org> <5480846B.9090908@bluerosetech.com> <20141204164259.GA45875@home.parts-unknown.org> <20141204222703.GA4133@milliways> <5480ECC2.2090908@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5480ECC2.2090908@bluerosetech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Ken Moffat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 01:14:51 -0000 --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:22:42PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 12/4/2014 2:27 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> > > For most of hte questions here, I'm a linux user so I do not have > > useful detail. But for this one: Postfix provides a sendmail > > program, although it might not install it in the same directory as > > the real sendmail (I do not remember). >=20 > It will, it's why it has a conflict with mail/sendmail* and others.=20 > What David may not have done is activate Postfix's sendmail program for= =20 > mailwrapper (the thing that uses /etc/mail/mailer.conf to point at=20 > various bits of sendmail). In fact, I had. I was, however, surprised to see that mailman even *could* be built for MTAs other than postfix--at least this is what the config options seem to suggest--as I had always understood mailman to require postfix. (Might be a linuxism with pre-built packages.) --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUgQcKAAoJEBV64x4SNmArNCsP/Rn+oCciz+txEMycbPAWkxGU mmkNnhXEJAv2v77TzQBWGId32ele2Cry26lPF+TgxL0/HTFWFBAh3cYKWcI4oUS1 iY14PQToUYXs2M2zMF0n1fENKyfGiiUCRH9+QTZcTZomx6/rzSbyujGXYUqSBldY hwKKJ7r7TFETeEvZfqmPBEkZQlGE1O0YorO/svfXKIOGDMQLGzqMiocerUrbsTZZ EE65YoOjzj0ZYpt6GhtoWoUo3SiwtTqkP2sDQZfI5Qw+3VJ6UyrwOdwOqgPb4ySd UhSUZrCudyiu8j63guIjUFr63Ii6kPNPMmyFTnbBAfkU5DzDZGWHSq1q1mK+UhlP 0Z75eoeF5jhnzaWpg/b6SnwTfBKmgLWfWgz3MiU5sFesblNKiieLDqO+2+dbRui5 4OM4Uk7zjlzGtOvQVyBwiU3NB6iBmcleVeMSxWFAbigkTW9QKGXGe+yr5APPilHq j0CKXsEdh4lyfwnfP3g7YPRCJ3l1Mg/u9Kpl5nvwhtD/DO6dKCJzktHteI3fDALK QvRjKNymGz/2NTtlAWD78D1+wcpEnRvWRZ44W5HoXoU65HVmowkr9K3K3OIWdIbn 1lY2dPiROD2iafR38NgXQB/EQe+Us1XkMXdMYN8jbDK+HabxOGNRwvLMRT0dcTew Wmu92hRynsmmGQEH6KCH =s2OT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zS7rBR6csb6tI2e1--