From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 22 10:13:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8B037B401 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2686A43F13 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0MIDVbs040124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:13:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0MIDUTF040121; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:13:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:13:30 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200301221813.h0MIDUTF040121@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Jan Srzednicki Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: background fsck did not create lost+found In-Reply-To: References: <20030120183442.GA2778@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Would that be a big problem to allow some fsck option not to erase all > these softupdates-pending inodes, but to put them in lost+found as usual? It certainly couldn't be done with the background fsck, because background fsck works on a snapshot and not the running filesystem; thus, it cannot make any allocations -- it can only deallocate things. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message