From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Feb  2 15:38:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20715
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from garfield.panix.com (lsmarso.dialup.access.net [166.84.254.60])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA20710
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from larry@localhost) by garfield.panix.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) id XAA05133 for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 23:03:46 GMT
Message-ID: <XFMail.970202180345.lsmarso@panix.com>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 17:56:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Larry Marso <lsmarso@panix.com>
To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: xdvi and postscript
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Using the teTeX distribution, xdvi should be able (using gsftopk) to
represent postscript fonts, eliminating the need to view pages with
such fonts with ghostview.  This worked fine on a Linux machine I had. 
But, in FreeBSD there's something wrong with the references or something
missing from the distribution, I think.  xdvi substitutes (poorly)
non-postscript fonts.


Any suggestions out there?

Regards.
----------------------------------
Larry Marso <lsmarso@panix.com>
date: 02-Feb-97
Time: 17:56:25