From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 2 15:38:31 1997 Return-Path: <owner-questions> Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20715 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:38:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from garfield.panix.com (lsmarso.dialup.access.net [166.84.254.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA20710 for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:38:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from larry@localhost) by garfield.panix.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) id XAA05133 for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 23:03:46 GMT Message-ID: <XFMail.970202180345.lsmarso@panix.com> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 17:56:25 -0500 (EST) From: Larry Marso <lsmarso@panix.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: xdvi and postscript Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Using the teTeX distribution, xdvi should be able (using gsftopk) to represent postscript fonts, eliminating the need to view pages with such fonts with ghostview. This worked fine on a Linux machine I had. But, in FreeBSD there's something wrong with the references or something missing from the distribution, I think. xdvi substitutes (poorly) non-postscript fonts. Any suggestions out there? Regards. ---------------------------------- Larry Marso <lsmarso@panix.com> date: 02-Feb-97 Time: 17:56:25