Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:29:39 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, lukem@NetBSD.org Subject: Re: [fbsd] libexec/lukemftpd breaks with NO_SHARED Message-ID: <8664ka8bfw.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060512142255.GA69418@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> (Jeremie Le Hen's message of "Fri, 12 May 2006 16:22:55 %2B0200") References: <20060509150839.GD84148@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060512142255.GA69418@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> writes: > I contacted OpenSSH folks to ask them if it was possible to change the > name of their functions, but they answered me that libssh is an internal > library and should not be used elsewhere. > > I don't know why lukemftpd uses it, I suppose the author had good > reasons. I Cc'd him in case he has time to enlighten me on this point. lukemftpd does not use libssh, but it uses libpam. When compiled statically, libpam contains all the PAM modules in the tree, including pam_ssh, which uses libssh. The whole static libpam thing is an ugly hack that I wish would go away, but some people insist on building static versions of login(1) and other binaries which depend on libpam. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8664ka8bfw.fsf>