Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:20:46 -0500 From: Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com> To: Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sysadmin article Message-ID: <20010614222046.A75265@virtual-voodoo.com> In-Reply-To: <200106150223.f5F2NLW08368@panix1.panix.com>; from rsi@panix.com on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:23:21PM -0400 References: <200106150223.f5F2NLW08368@panix1.panix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:23:21PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote: > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm > > Any obvious reasons why FreeBSD performed so poorly for these people? Hrm... the filesystem test, I think, is fairly obvious. The default filesystem configuration doesn't have softupdates. Linux always outperforms FreeBSD on filesystem tests using "out of the box" configurations. The others I'm iffy on. There was still a file system element in the other tests as well (delivering e-mail) and depending on the way they layout their email the new dirpref code may help out a bit? -Steve > > rsi > -- > <rsi@panix.com> a.k.a. Rajappa Iyer. > They also surf who stand in the waves. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010614222046.A75265>