From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 12:11:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EE51065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA588FC1F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so7653025bkv.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=f5cBG5Gwu/BH5fBCRbGosXCmex5h8Xx3Ziu8MfrMrxU=;
	b=J3hUbfXtSA3CAmKmWSNpTBZpBEn6ZTH2DJFtMmfyAtS0lYpyhA0VOnR6x/aKF8hlEx
	W7D4krqVZZNUum31LkCjbw/SpoJSX4IkQixcsV0/+nI6oEQer0lj15kbjEzRZpEt8ZR+
	EiffWiOX1XCKHS5Vt1YsEmGkTWS/WyMKhn2O1octDiIAIobydJB0FadmTkQg+4EJZ3XF
	T0asbdDRVvSocgqY2hhDN+jUs+s1OHIy+kYKOa8dZM15KklDrsVC1v9sQJ1sGLLhhd+p
	tbYGmkgqUmJ6oSxMlJMob38MIya+8EDDyWONr3uM2Ks9EiU2RwyIAJo6w8kL1p7myCx+
	GpBA==
Received: by 10.204.145.89 with SMTP id c25mr10178455bkv.5.1340194288335;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from green.tandem.local (utwig.xim.bz. [91.216.237.46])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2sm27489970bkm.2.2012.06.20.05.11.26
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FE1BDEC.1040705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:11:24 +0300
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120605 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=+wEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK0S=tsYfUhuL6BsUPu7u+tB47gMGGTp6Abevh0_1CaayA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201024140.40030@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAH3a3KWy9Qzf5BOUGWM3TLZe5XV3gKz0WhWQJ1q8j9F3FV7hYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201054480.23394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<4FE19BFC.7030304@gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201212150.23787@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>,
	Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, Fred Morcos <fred.morcos@gmail.com>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:11:30 -0000

Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> And why you think it's not better then gcc?
>
> because - as you already should know - test shows otherwise.

Test show only that clang-compiled binaries are still subject for 
improvement. It doesn't show how strict and clear this binary is.

> As well as FreeBSD running predictable with gcc anyway.

You mileage may vary. I'm using clang-compiled world & ports on 
production servers since clang was added to the ports. And nothing bad 
happens to me.

> Still theory and ideology.

That what you do too. You are stating clang is less potent only by 
counting speed estimates. You leave aside things like standard 
compliance, ease of use and healthy ecosystem.

Besides, NetBSD and OpenBSD has already selected and using pcc now. And 
they are fine with that one.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.