From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 09:34:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E35A37B401 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A1343FA3 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:34:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4TGYfNQ092362; Thu, 29 May 2003 18:34:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4TGYaPG092361; Thu, 29 May 2003 18:34:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:34:36 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Thomas Moestl Message-ID: <20030529183436.A90255@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20030529113731.GB630@crow.dom2ip.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030529113731.GB630@crow.dom2ip.de>; from t.moestl@tu-bs.de on Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:37:31PM +0200 cc: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PLEASE TEST: interrupt assignment patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:34:43 -0000 On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:37:31PM +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get the attached patch into 5.1; although I am quite > confident that it will not break anything, we need a good test coverage > (i.e. testing on many different models) to make sure this is the case, > since we are that close to a release. > > Therefore, I would very much appreciate if people could give this a > spin on their machines and report back. > > The aim of the patch is to fix the interrupt assignment on e450s; it > should not have any effect on other boxen. It has been tested so far > on two e450s, a Blade 100 and an u60. > Doesn't seem to have any ill effects on an Ultra AXi. There's only a little difference in the dmesg: -pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0 +pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 0x7c0, bus A