Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:00:29 -0800 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: modern stable/12 and stable/11 build artifacts.ci.freebsd.org materials are available Message-ID: <08F8B928-2753-4C25-8709-96FC1D4ECDC4@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <F8B20FD3-2890-4727-BCD0-1CF5C5F99483@yahoo.com> References: <F8B20FD3-2890-4727-BCD0-1CF5C5F99483@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-Jan-12, at 18:37, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > FYI: > > As of 2021-Jan-07 stable/12 and stable/11 builds are > happening and artifacts for them are showing up under: > > https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-12/ > > and > > https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/stable-11/ > > (and aliases of those). > > But I'm not aware of any list getting notices of the > builds yet. Looks like I just made the bad assumption that the list(s) covering stable/12 and stable/11 would be svn and svn-id (r??????) based to match how offical builds are made: so still in the old place for finding such. Instead . . . https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/dev-commits-src-branches/2021-January/ (and before) are being populated --but in git style without the page showing r?????? numbers in the one line summaries for stable/12 or stable/11 . Nor does the content of the messages report the svn based r?????? numbering, apparently the messages are generated before the svn conversion. So, one searches (for example) https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/12 logs for a "Git Hash:" prefix in order to identify the r?????? number to match a list entry. (I'm not objecting but I did not guess the style of use correctly.) > main is not building yet (so no artifacts are available > yet for main). === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08F8B928-2753-4C25-8709-96FC1D4ECDC4>