From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 03:16:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E012A16A4B3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C068F43F85; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 03:16:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BAC79A34; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:10 +0100 (MET) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id AC8879C049; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id EE7479BFF3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id E7BD5B823; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 (CET) To: Alfred Perlstein References: <200310251614.h9PGE925019013@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031025233749.GW99943@elvis.mu.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:16:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031025233749.GW99943@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Sat, 25 Oct 2003 16:37:49 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dsa.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Robert Watson cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:16:13 -0000 Alfred Perlstein writes: > This is bad, it's time to add a flag to the vnode to do this > properly instead of relying upon the underlying FS to implement > the locking. Sounds like a layering violation to me - or am I talking out of my nether regions? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no