From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 19 12:32:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rapidnet.com (rapidnet.com [205.164.216.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6937BD27 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@rapidnet.com) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost) by rapidnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA47905; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:31:02 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:31:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness To: "Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppp -nat or ppp with ipf's ipnat ?? In-Reply-To: <20000615133454.A98489@lunatic.oneinsane.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote: > I am building a simple straight forward machine fro a friend. Here is > what it is going to do. > Connect to the internet via a dial-up modem > Assign IP's to the LAN using DHCP > Provide internet access for the lan by using NAT > -- The Delimma -- > What is the better way of doing this? > - Use the builtin NAT in user-ppp > - Use IPFilter's ipnat The builtin NAT seems to work OK. I have also used natd/ipfw combo with success. Nick Rogness - Speak softly and carry a Gigabit switch. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message