From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 2 11:40:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4399316A426 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 11:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1E443D55 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 11:40:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33A3200116; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 13:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id DA18C2000FA; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 13:40:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58258444F41; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 11:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 11:38:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov In-Reply-To: <20060402130227.G99958@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Message-ID: <20060402113516.D76259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <442D8E98.6050903@vineyard.net> <20060331222813.GA29047@zen.inc> <20060331223613.GD80492@spc.org> <20060402130227.G99958@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: VANHULLEBUS Yvan , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcpdump and ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 11:40:17 -0000 On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > Hello! > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:28:13AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: >>> 2) use enc0 support, which is actually pr kern/94829, and which should >>> be included soon in kernel. >> >> Oh god! Not another ifnet! NoOOOOOO!!!!!! > > Why not? IMHO it will be very useful feature: think about e.g. traffic > shaping for several different networks which are routed via the same > ipsec tunnel. Without the enc0, you can only shape them together, e.g.: why not shaping on the internal interface in case this is a gateway? You know src and dst there too. The only difference enc0 makes is for host-only-setups or if you want to see all your unencrpyted ipsec traffic on a gateway in one place. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT