From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 17:19:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AE11065686; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EEF8FC23; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id n59HJGCB017383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:19:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4A2E9994.7070907@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:19:16 -0700 From: Sam Leffler Organization: FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kip Macy References: <200904190016.n3J0G4rA090911@svn.freebsd.org> <20090609143729.R22887@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <3c1674c90906091012u26b0e823q57a7ea1f42eef22d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3c1674c90906091012u26b0e823q57a7ea1f42eef22d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-sonic.net-Metrics: ebb.errno.com; whitelist Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r191255 - in head/sys: amd64/conf conf i386/conf net X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:19:18 -0000 Kip Macy wrote: >> I think FLOWTABLE does nto belong into DEFAULTS. Really DEFAULTS was >> meant for "You cannot boot without this" and if people start to weaken >> it, DEFAULTS will soon be the new GENERIC. That said I am not sure it >> belongs to GENERIC either. >> > > I can either push it in to GENERIC or I can change it to NOFLOWTABLE. > If you want to remove it from GENERIC then we're going to have to have > a lengthy discussion about what most FreeBSD users actually use and > gut GENERIC as it stands now. The fact is, most FreeBSD users have > sufficiently few peers that flowtable is a win over using the routing > table on every lookup. > I believe the question was mainly about mechanics, FLOWTABLE doesn't belong in DEFAULTS but it may well belong in GENERIC. Sam