From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 4 18:16:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D9665D for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 18:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D939ECC0 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 18:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m18so3541785vcm.22 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:16:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CM8tmangjINKI2bTYR+D4LqV85uQDGow7zqBrVisZxw=; b=wL2eXN3K8hto9pQ40gwmt6IlX87odAVQAjIGI2/y/QEFjWb/nHQxwNa8B5Y/Q48Z5K c4V/PnZ7+dcs+Uqp5HA4po+t/2QXoT4F772I94MB30qBpzIsFvhAH/wFAZVMwZ0OfAYd j07UlMLrhq1enF92DOJ8OC20AVV8T04sLVMo/zjERe8u7Tf+CV9chvmEaFtADyOx/zd1 ea7gSK2ttlB50WTC3Ugk3HO3C7uCF2Dzq42GwksQ4laQfASqrCGHGoaqXSW/EhUBoHHF nHZwEGoH0438uUAAk/osv2l8Qx/vLRP8i52yq9XdMEtfAL3UwnMNsl4HNMGKesEVKpPj qmyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.214.231 with SMTP id od7mr8381659vec.44.1362420978031; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.191.132 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:16:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <512BAA60.3060703@biostat.wisc.edu> <512BAF8D.7080308@biostat.wisc.edu> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:16:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: igb network lockups From: Jack Vogel To: Sepherosa Ziehau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Nick Rogers , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Christopher D. Harrison" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:16:19 -0000 On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: ... > > > For 82574L, i.e. supported by em(4), MSI-X must _not_ be enabled; it > is simply broken (you could check 82574 errata on Intel's website to > confirm what I have said here). > If you actually checked the errata you will find that its not "simply broken", furthermore it most certainly SHOULD be enabled, it is by default in the Linux driver as well as mine, the issue is not with the 82574, its with some system designs that have upstream PCIE problems. If you experience problems with a particular system, then we recommend disabling MSIX to determine if this hardware issue may be behind it. In most cases MSIX works just fine. > > For 82575, i.e. supported by igb(4), MSI-X must _not_ be enabled; it > is simply broken (you could check 82575 errata on Intel's website to > confirm what I have said here). > > The same issue obtains on the 82575, its a system issue, and we have tested the part on our Reference systems in prolonged stress without any problem. So the same recommendation as above applies. Jack Vogel Intel Network Division