From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 07:36:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2462616A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 07:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.alexdupre.com (host245-49.pool8288.interbusiness.it [82.88.49.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDB343D39 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 07:36:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (thunder.alexdupre.com [192.168.0.101]) i54EZlHO033307; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:35:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <40C088C3.3020408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:35:47 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yar Tikhiy References: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:36:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yar Tikhiy wrote: | Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port | to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing | allowed by the license? Yes. | The comments at the top of bsd.port.mk, and the Porter's Handbook | seem to imply that these variables are mutually exclusive. I personally reworded that paragraph in the Porter's Handbook to be much more clear. And I read in the first note: "NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM are independent and can be set simultaneously." So I don't know how you can say that the handbook seems to imply they are mutually exclusive :-) - -- Alex Dupre -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAwIjCgRXp2M5fVU0RAlRjAKDpiC/dkNMRU/DmOJ/neKRIQ6I/TACgzRrl kzIXCFPDV2CTwvoboPOXESY= =32Nu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----