Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:14:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265682] net/samba413: Fails to build with the latest security/krb5 (1.20) Message-ID: <bug-265682-7788-yrVVVECkvT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-265682-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-265682-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265682 --- Comment #5 from Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Timur I. Bakeyev from comment #4) I don't want to argue with your point asking why the user wants to use MIT = KRB5 when Heimdal KRB5 builds. But, can you explain how Heimdal is "more feature= ful" than MIT KRB5, please? Still, your answer to why you believe Heimdal is "more featureful" than MIT doesn't mitigate your point that the user should try to build against base Heimdal. Which BTW, I've been asked to upgrade our ancient Heimdal 1.5 in base to 7.= 7.0. Heimdal 7.7.0 may pose the same challenge as MIT 1.20 whereas Heimdal 1.5 in base does not. (I would think both MIT 1.20 and Heimdal 7.7.0 support newer KRB5 standards than our ancient 1.5 in base.) Can the user please try building Samba413 with Heimdal 7.7.0 in ports. I'm interested in what the result might be. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265682-7788-yrVVVECkvT>