From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 14 18:32:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E559637B400; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 887AE5347; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:32:01 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Peter Wemm , Murray Stokely , current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS Issues with branch.. Was: Re: HEADS UP: Be nice to -CURRENT ( "1 week Feature Slush" ) References: <20020315004008.D022138CC@overcee.wemm.org> <200203150227.g2F2RIe27557@bmah.dyndns.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 15 Mar 2002 03:32:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200203150227.g2F2RIe27557@bmah.dyndns.org> Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Bruce A. Mah" writes: > Differences of opinion on naming aside...the branch isn't supposed to > last long at all. The point is to provide a slightly polished snapshot > to the wider developer community. We can't do the QA/releng work on > HEAD without calling for a code freeze (which we early on decided that > we would *not* do). Then you don't need a branch, you just need a simple tag, and you can slide it forward if something needs fixing, and remove it after rolling and shipping the snapshot. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message