Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:41:53 -0700 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. Message-ID: <5170225e.c5b8440a.548f.3e8b@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <201304181137.17627.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2E.. Why would it differ for the same machine, different kernel? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 8:40 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:=20 On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wro= te=20 into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies abo= ut=20 which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful messa= ge shows the same interrupts used in both cases: > HEAD: >=20 > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device= 0.0 on pci10 > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 >=20 > versus >=20 > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device= 0.0 on pci10 > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 --=20 John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5170225e.c5b8440a.548f.3e8b>