Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:41:53 -0700 From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. Message-ID: <5170225e.c5b8440a.548f.3e8b@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <201304181137.17627.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... Why would it differ for the same machine, different kernel? Adrian Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Apr 18, 2013 8:40 AM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas? Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wrote into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies about which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful message shows the same interrupts used in both cases: > HEAD: > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10 > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 > > versus > > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18 > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10 > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60 -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5170225e.c5b8440a.548f.3e8b>