From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 22 01:45:42 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA14813 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 01:45:42 -0700 Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA14805 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 01:45:40 -0700 Received: from shadows.cs.hut.fi by hutcs.cs.hut.fi with SMTP id AA27674 (5.65c8/HUTCS-S 1.4 for ); Sat, 22 Jul 1995 11:45:30 +0300 Received: (hsu@localhost) by shadows.cs.hut.fi (8.6.10/8.6.10) id LAA02660; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 11:45:34 +0300 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 1995 11:45:34 +0300 Message-Id: <199507220845.LAA02660@shadows.cs.hut.fi> From: Heikki Suonsivu To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com's message of 22 Jul 1995 01:42:31 +0300 Subject: Support charges ( was Re: SUP target for -STABLE...) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I'm happy to pay for *actual* support which I receive, but my feel on this > is that I am not going to pay for a staffer full-time if the work that he or > she produces goes back to *everyone*. Wow, I hope I'm parsing this in-correctly, but my impression is that *if* you pay for support, you don't want the fixes to go to anyone else. I'm only willing to pay for support if the fixes are passed to everyone. This also includes NetBSD folks in here, I won't support anything which takes *BSD* further apart. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN