From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 14:17:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2B81065673 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from connollys1@yahoo.com) Received: from web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D6748FC1E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61802 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Mar 2010 13:50:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1267710656; bh=2AgINQwYgH3cFz4WYl1LdERpQTkFbrEQZ/DTvVUsX/g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FXd0jcln+1Xuk8Pk8rNhVibM2krE8B+LaIt3ljVxlTIaGGb0E3i/Entp2A97WjT1UhT+gYjK6Xxc4YA7M2e3zHZ3wF3FDRIrYiPoyhDSe4J8whuFxTHrlCNxqn7wHFeZijFD6TwOsINnYRFdnIbLZpsJ+NdNAoJxd70B+gyZJQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kBzAVXQYXtiA/gFfYPfl+2LMtM71ilSEJyD3iNIbhbQwRHbhRyCDlGchqymn+LufJkJAY3RsR0vNKm1GxmKFZqL+Rx1ywxaKyZc7Hk1gtuwBmHiP/k3kHrMMYm1fHtN4WiTPIU9DNUbHSNzkZohoRWwTOXynOjHr2qIQrWa2CUQ=; Message-ID: <775910.52553.qm@web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: cDLlguYVM1lhv5c8jE.1VAZL9dOhvqyNSLePVkkvRgM45sm7Jt8NSiBdu0MXJd4ZHge6xhvh00UOv4NVwlsHVGWDUVkRgj2gsqovUqUXdJZPu4yn1Vh2nKBbtJt.blav64sjCThVp5H5yDdv2TSHHWUltnSs6TMQhmTsdq57AMzZKdWvE66k2v2Dsx4Ackp00Czb8Np_J33PyE7yzZdzDFeHIE7KJOsKuzKdFIlUugI7VAjW4fcP7wdNynK7MwIgw_2jrc.mSU_Rbaz7zxOHJnhjMOSO3Uw_gHuguzNERZbD78EiqpfGIiPQro5l5A-- Received: from [128.36.117.70] by web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:50:56 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/300.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:50:56 -0800 (PST) From: sean connolly To: Dan Naumov In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Automated kernel crash reporting system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:17:40 -0000 Hi Dan, Automatic reporting would end up being a mess given that panics can be caused by hardware problems. Having an autoreport check if memtest was run before it reports, or having it only run with -CURRENTmight be useful. Sean ________________________________ From: jhell To: Dan Naumov Cc: FreeBSD Hackers ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 8:06:50 AM Subject: Re: Automated kernel crash reporting system On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:09, dan.naumov@ wrote: > Hello > > I noticed the following on the FreeBSD website: > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ideas.html#p-autoreport Has > there been any progress/work done on the automated kernel crash > reporting system? The current ways of enabling and gathering the > information required by developers for investigating panics and > similar issues are unintuitive and user-hostile to say the least and > anything to automate the process would be a very welcome addition. > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > Hi Dan, I am assuming that the output of crashinfo_enable="YES" is not what you are talking about is it ? are you aware of it ? The info contained in the crashinfo.txt.N is pretty informative for developers, maybe your talking about another way of submitting it ? Regards, -- jhell _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"