From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 08:05:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230F2106566C for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99B98FC2A for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 08:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B123A67FAAA; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7O2skP-LLoC3; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599867FAA7; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4L84Ntx070014; Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:04:22 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Chagin Dmitry Message-ID: <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org> References: <200805191106.m4JB6oBF011533@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:05:05 -0000 On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:09:17AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2008, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote: > > >Current FreeBSD problem reports > >Critical problems > >Serious problems > > > >S Tracker Resp. Description > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not > >allow setu > >o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux > >emulation > >o kern/117010 emulation [linux] linux_getdents() get something like > >buffer ove > > > > about 117010... > Can somebody test this patch on amd64 and i386? > It is necessary linux_base-f8, 2.6.16, -current. can you describe the idea behind the patch? why do you think it's correct to replace fcntl64 with fcntl args? I'll take a look at this some further but I want to know the rationale behind this thnx! roman