From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 21:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70CA16A5A2 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@xfoil.gank.org) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3080843D49 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from craig@xfoil.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7490A115B4; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:50:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:50:06 -0500 From: Craig Boston To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20060602215005.GA43170@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , Giorgos Keramidas , Kris Kennaway , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20060522231437.GC1446@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20060523133037.GA2908@gothmog.pc> <20060523143013.GA11472@ci0.org> <20060523194106.GA46634@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060524203645.GB13500@gothmog.pc> <20060524203747.GA88742@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060524204617.GA13701@gothmog.pc> <20060601002024.GA1453@gothmog.pc> <20060601210655.GA36389@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060601213527.GA53422@gothmog.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601213527.GA53422@gothmog.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: md /tmp and async mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 21:50:26 -0000 On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:35:27AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Ok, I'll prepare a patch that enables async and disables -M. We should > also document the fact that tmpmfs="YES" and varmfs="YES" in rc.conf may > require the presence of at least one swap device by default, and point > the users to -M with a warning if they run FreeBSD without a swap device > but still want to use tmpmfs or varmfs :) I may be mistaken, but from my (brief) reading of the code it seems to me that perhaps "swap-backed" isn't an entirely accurate term. More like "VM-backed", with the understanding that VM is (usually) backed by swap. I think if you don't have any swap configured, a swap-backed md will be no worse off than a memory-backed one would. Craig