Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 May 2013 00:04:09 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Spil Oss <spil.oss@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Problems with ipfw/natd and axe(4)
Message-ID:  <20130510200409.GT15182@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAEJyAvNL4NWmm8BMGkT6usZgGt2VWJNqQXeXBgYY9%2BMiNoUBVw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAEJyAvOZ6fW0i3yT_D4fH1huje-qsJwA7GGeXqAO1PKzge-YNw@mail.gmail.com> <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAHu1Y73Xu64NY1B=idaKmHKDGOB3AHbcXKi4A48-SNkhJrMy6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20130415160625.K56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAEJyAvP-4FZ7eZ0o4c3qMzC0nY_gT4GfS3KjBVQiuzNY3aXz4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJyAvMGKr9gZEEhg2KCD2FkZ=F4Xbx20v8iWyu8hhA_Pq8phw@mail.gmail.com> <20130417133637.W56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAEJyAvO_KA8dYSLkFXCoBqcogTkurBX_X=KZn25R4MKoeUGaVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJyAvNL4NWmm8BMGkT6usZgGt2VWJNqQXeXBgYY9%2BMiNoUBVw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  Spil,

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
S> There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
S> ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
S> there that I hit?

Yes, a regression is possible there. However, the issue seems to be
axe(4) specific, since there are no reports on more common NICs.

S> Just upgraded to r250404 but that does not help. Should I file a PR?

Having a PR, with all information gathered in one report,  is definitely
better than not having one.


-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130510200409.GT15182>