From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 27 13: 4:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922B637B68F; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA50222; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:04:48 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Igor Vinokurov Cc: Keith Stevenson , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pw && umask In-Reply-To: <20000227164230.A947@shogun.rtsnet.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Igor Vinokurov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 21:51 -0500, Keith Stevenson wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:01:46PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Igor Vinokurov wrote: > > > > > > > May be it is necessary to add support umask? > > > > > > This should be a trivial amount of hacking (i.e. add another option to > > > specify the umask and then use it instead of the hardcoded 0755). Anyone > > > up for it? > > > > Patch attached. > > Whether commiting it in -STABLE is possible? Probably not for a few weeks. 4.0 is in code freeze for release, but once it's opened up again I can commit it there for testing, and then merge it back to -stable once it's known to work. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message