From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 13:21:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991BB106564A for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545128FC0C for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so1961301ywf.13 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=J8RfFZxeRBiXukMi+xcXmnkf5Lop05qbncehztGARTc=; b=v9MjVY4aWWm6jw4DnMLqYkDMcPfnpf4fIuZOVx41diR/0ue5/nHbCmUYL04xmUcu1M WofPUcW95asBxODIOiGtZ5oXCO1LhNRSDYO1Z+oS5t3/4UazTehnUQN9GB94gp4N24te CANbIkFF0crfiuFjN2qc62gMwWGYpGYrtNTak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=PiSSqUfU/9O7/o06NpIwWzW6NijSLlaNtQCYT+HFXWn+ZKPJ8e63/KQNE1crS/NtML 3QtaEt3ZHM+zw94e5LlvfCV6RaSyw2A94N4wcgQM0UiTNta0qCOP3nxj1/+2+KXBqJTG b+Y8zfI33zbYFOVzPLCNbbv54g3LQCNvxgHXo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.72.23 with SMTP id u23mr4622259yba.160.1307798517496; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.216.3 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110611104355.GH48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20110611104355.GH48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:21:57 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -XPzLlbyTD1Ez5VPUj5qVRUPkhw Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Kostik Belousov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] shipping kernels with default modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:21:58 -0000 On 11 June 2011 18:43, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> Is there any reason we aren't doing this at the moment? Eg by having a >> default loader modules list populated from the kernel config file? > I use highly modularized kernel on all machines, because it allows me > to use (almost) the same kernel config. > > Will you provide a prototype change for your suggestion ? Sure, but in a couple weeks, or when I decide next to avoid study and need a break from if_ath hackery, whichever comes first. Thanks, Adrian