Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:21:57 +0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] shipping kernels with default modules?
Message-ID:  <BANLkTi=_ByLY9BZs92Uf4e%2BidKkDx-LbCw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110611104355.GH48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <BANLkTin2AwKRT7N6HWqBctJcT72_mR=Otg@mail.gmail.com> <20110611104355.GH48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 June 2011 18:43, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Is there any reason we aren't doing this at the moment? Eg by having a
>> default loader modules list populated from the kernel config file?
> I use highly modularized kernel on all machines, because it allows me
> to use (almost) the same kernel config.
>
> Will you provide a prototype change for your suggestion ?

Sure, but in a couple weeks, or when I decide next to avoid study and
need a break from if_ath hackery, whichever comes first.

Thanks,



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=_ByLY9BZs92Uf4e%2BidKkDx-LbCw>