Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:13 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Rich Hampton <rich@hamptonhouse.org> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syscons on U10 /w Creator Message-ID: <20040115044213.GA26182@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <4006182B.7090400@hamptonhouse.org> References: <4005FFC9.20308@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115031013.GA52532@xor.obsecurity.org> <400613C4.1090105@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org> <4006182B.7090400@hamptonhouse.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:33:47PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > By the way, is puc really necessary here? I thought that had to do with > i386 bios issues. Yes, puc(4) is necessary. Multi-channel SCCs are handled by puc(4) with uart(4) taking care of a single channel only. Without puc(4) the SCC is not probed/supported. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115044213.GA26182>