Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 20:40:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 265760] [NEW PORT] archivers/py-compressed-rtf: Compressed RTF compression and decompression package Message-ID: <bug-265760-7788-oB2oqm52UH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-265760-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-265760-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D265760 --- Comment #1 from Jes=C3=BAs Daniel Colmenares Oviedo <DtxdF@riseup.net> = --- I have a question: in the Porter's Handbook, section 5.7.5. "LICENSE_FILE a= nd LICENSE_FILE_NAME" says: "If the file is not in the distfile, and its content is too long to be put = in LICENSE_TEXT, put it in a new file in ${FILESDIR}". I include the license because the above is true in my case, but is it neces= sary to include the license even if bsd.licenses.db.mk mentions it? This package does not send the license in the distfile, but the license is = not unknown, although the manual does not say "only unknown license", but I gue= ss "with all licenses". I have seen some ports that include the license, like "www/py-django-smart-selects" and its includes a known license "BSD3CLAUSE"= . I guess this is necessary because bsd.license.db.mk does not include the cont= ent, only the names. is it true? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-265760-7788-oB2oqm52UH>