From owner-cvs-all Sat Sep 30 10:22:56 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF5737B503; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hamlet.nectar.com (hamlet.nectar.com [10.0.1.102]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609CE1925D; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:22:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by hamlet.nectar.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA16326; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:22:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 12:22:45 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Warner Losh Cc: Don Lewis , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/net hesiod.c Message-ID: <20000930122245.A9696@hamlet.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Warner Losh , Don Lewis , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <20000930002146.A69517@hamlet.nectar.com> <200009300318.UAA19183@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <200009291256.FAA32249@freefall.freebsd.org> <200009300318.UAA19183@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <200009300507.e8U57YG24889@billy-club.village.org> <20000930002146.A69517@hamlet.nectar.com> <200009301632.e8UGVrG29739@billy-club.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200009301632.e8UGVrG29739@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:31:53AM -0600 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:31:53AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000930002146.A69517@hamlet.nectar.com> "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > : I'll let you or the security officer handle. > I am the security officer :-) I'll go ahead and handle then. Oops, I was confused. For some reason I thought you passed the torch -- maybe because of all the (excellent) pccard work and by-laws pushing. :-) Sorry. > I'll have to look into this. I think the check in ld.so predates > issetugid() Possibly. rtld-elf is younger than issetugid, but probably it was started from the a.out rtld, which used the same style check (as our current rtld-elf). At any rate I'm convinced after looking at issetugid's use in the resolver, and thinking about it. I don't see that any (legit) functionality would be lost by using issetugid, so I'll go ahead and change it. Feel free to tweak if you learn something different, but I think this horse is dead. And do have a look at rtld-elf -- I suspect it is the same type of oversight. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message