From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 6 11:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716C16A4CE for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 11:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakermmtao08.cox.net (lakermmtao08.cox.net [68.230.240.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3659043D2D for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 11:20:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from ip68-11-70-23.no.no.cox.net ([68.11.70.23]) by lakermmtao08.cox.netESMTP <20040606182004.RZPU5121.lakermmtao08.cox.net@ip68-11-70-23.no.no.cox.net>; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:20:04 -0400 Received: from ip68-11-70-23.no.no.cox.net (localhost.no.no.cox.net [127.0.0.1])i56IK4VL033816; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 13:20:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-11-70-23.no.no.cox.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost)i56IJwFd033815; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 13:19:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:19:58 -0500 (CDT) From: Conrad Sabatier To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt Subject: One more followup on atapi issues (broken device now removed) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: conrads@cox.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 18:20:07 -0000 Just another quick update: I've now completely disabled the broken device, disconnecting it completely from the system. The system now boots and shuts down just fine with a world/kernel updated and built yesterday (Saturday, June 5), and the DVD-ROM on acd0 is working just fine. I may go buy a replacement for the burner later today, if I can find anything around here that I like. We'll see. Anyway, it looks like the current ata/atapi/atapicam code is fine. Just wanted to let you know, Soren. -- Conrad Sabatier - "In Unix veritas"