From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 07:28:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686BB16A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gactr.uga.edu (mail.gactr.uga.edu [128.192.37.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B7D43D1F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:28:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robin.blanchard@gactr.uga.edu) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with SMTP id 77A3277318 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:28:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from EBE1.gc.nat (E2K1.gc.nat [10.10.11.21]) by mail.gactr.uga.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6A7770D9 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:28:32 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:28:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: AAC vs AMR vs getblk [Re: Processes blocked on getblk or ufs] Thread-Index: AcPtQKw7B2T9Bc5KQKmdg2VCx8mOrwCqYkyg From: "Robin P. Blanchard" To: Subject: RE: AAC vs AMR vs getblk [Re: Processes blocked on getblk or ufs] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:28:33 -0000 > I'm finally catching up on this thread after a busy couple of=20 > weeks where I wasn't reading much list email. There seems to=20 > be two problem areas in the thread, AAC and AMR. For the AAC=20 > problems, I've put a work-around in place until I find the=20 > root cause. The work-around appears to work well; I can no=20 > longer reproduce the problem where I could eadily reproduce=20 > it before, at the cost of reducing the command pool from 512=20 > to 504. Not a big hit overall, and I'll hopefully find the=20 > real fix this weekend. >=20 > Since I can't always read list email in detail, please please=20 > please email me directly if you have problems that might be=20 > related to aac. You'll have a much higher chance of catching=20 > my attention if you do that. >=20 > For AMR, it looks like there is indeed a real problem, but=20 > the driver is basically without a maintainer at this point. =20 > I don't have the time right now to learn it in enough detail=20 > to be useful. Thanks for the time and effort put into this! My dual 2650 is no longer exhibiting any getblk issues. I would definitely encourage this being back-ported to 5.2-rel or 5.2.1-rel. --------------------------------------- Robin P. Blanchard Systems Integration Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Education fon: 706.542.2404 < > fax: 706.542.6546 ---------------------------------------