From owner-freebsd-net Tue Apr 3 14:47:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from sherline.com (sherline.net [216.120.87.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9104A37B71D for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:47:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jgowdy@home.com) Received: (qmail 26116 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2001 21:47:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server2) (216.120.87.3) by 216.120.87.2 with SMTP; 3 Apr 2001 21:47:33 -0000 Message-ID: <000601c0bc87$ac955ad0$035778d8@sherline.net> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Rik van Riel" , "Michael C . Wu" Cc: "David Xu" , "Jonathan Graehl" , "Freebsd-Net" References: Subject: Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:47:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote: > > > I can confirm the following: > > A) You are a troll. > > B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail > > to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify > > your statements with facts. > > Neither do you. Does that make you a troll too? ;) > He did qualify his statement, "You are a troll" with the statement "You do not qualify your statements with facts", therefore he did qualify his statement with a fact, therefore he does not qualify under his own terms as a troll. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message