From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 21 13:39:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68E4CEFE for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A46765 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcrw7 with SMTP id w7so4922324qcr.4 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:39:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=51mKOaJSfsdR3wlgModPHQqKrJsLJt7JgmeTEPbg2j8=; b=Gl3c0Y87MCua+h3rPrEBrimskKZnTNKlgEnKt7uyGYbIE0Hqv9enAxF+sg4I5Fj1jh mp16gpLXgUpSeRdBuJ+km8D2vUwOcO00tqXKAdS3luomcfjZH9/0MqU2hf5hDdrU77UG PcqvUogVrQDw845BSJ4N0TFbWJ4/u4wW1oLzDEY4pASh1axkrXGxSMJKdL4k3BVLYTOm er2o9txv0/t+ZLr7nThLCRHBsb0AyCd5apoMfrO4EVoBZ+DYkTOYOPnjVF51UOD62Vkr rzhCs9pH3NgkDwSyFXxZkzDTJ+Xjly7eT+FIGQAMBtp4vbJnl8EvZWEEBgUzqruTmLYo Pmyg== X-Received: by 10.140.232.197 with SMTP id d188mr5806285qhc.80.1424525994164; Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.230] (pool-74-103-59-158.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [74.103.59.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm23828988qgf.14.2015.02.21.05.39.51 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Feb 2015 05:39:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54E88AA6.3000902@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 08:39:50 -0500 From: John Jasen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Stone Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1: Intel dual port 10GbE card (82599EB) second port not present? References: <54DCB8F2.5090809@gmail.com> <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:39:55 -0000 Well, oops. That would indeed explain the behavior. Thanks! On 02/20/2015 02:02 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: > I think that you might be a bit confused about the behaviour. An ix > port will only be missing if > > a) You have a non-Intel SFP+ installed > b) hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 is not set in loader.conf > > ix ports that have no SFP+ installed do show up in ifconfig