From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 28 10:47:52 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23962 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:47:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from B1FF.nas.nasa.gov (b1ff.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.34.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23957 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:47:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rone@B1FF.nas.nasa.gov) Received: (from rone@localhost) by B1FF.nas.nasa.gov (8.9.2/8.8.8) id KAA07837; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:38:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rone) From: Ron Echeverri Message-Id: <199901281838.KAA07837@B1FF.nas.nasa.gov> Subject: Re: What is the Final EOL Disposition of v2.2.8? In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990125024220.02ad1e60@granite.sentex.ca> from Mike Tancsa at "Jan 25, 1999 2:42:20 am" To: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:38:17 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Tancsa writes: BTW, is there a consensus that 3.x is stable enough to deploy into production ? Or should I wait for 3.1 RELEASE ? I am thinking specifically for news... I know best.com's been running their NNRP server on an SMP 3.0-current (yes, -current; it's apparently an older snapshot, for what that's worth) for quite a while now with very few problems. rone -- Ron Echeverri Numerical Aerospace Simulation Facility DSS/Usenet Administrator NASA Ames Research Center Sterling Software Mountain View, CA x42771 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message