From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  9 16:04:43 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1A516A400
	for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 16:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si)
Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6B43D46
	for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 16:04:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si)
Received: from localhost (mail4.ijs.si [193.2.4.66])
	by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E8617B8C5;
	Tue,  9 May 2006 18:04:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si
Received: from mail.ijs.si ([193.2.4.66])
	by localhost (mail.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id LxRV8OHYbjW4; Tue,  9 May 2006 18:04:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from edina.ijs.si (edina.ijs.si [193.2.4.3])
	by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12AA17B8B4;
	Tue,  9 May 2006 18:04:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from radagast.ijs.si (radagast.ijs.si [193.2.4.168])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by edina.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6235350842;
	Tue,  9 May 2006 18:04:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1])
	by radagast.ijs.si (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k49G4Xq3005712;
	Tue, 9 May 2006 18:04:34 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si)
From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:04:32 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <200605071756.k47HuSvD033837@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200605071756.k47HuSvD033837@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605091804.33074.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:04:43 -0000

On Sunday 07 May 2006 19:56, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear port maintainers,
>
> The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
> LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
> ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> them.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> LATEST_LINK          PORTNAME                       MAINTAINER
> ==========================================================================
> git                  devel/git                      anholt@FreeBSD.org
> git                  misc/git                       ports@FreeBSD.org
> imake                devel/imake-4                  x11@FreeBSD.org
> imake                devel/imake-6                  x11@FreeBSD.org

IIRC it was agreed that since imake-4 and imake-6 don't both produce packages 
on same FreeBSD version LATEST_LINK could stay as it is for both. Is it still 
OK if things stay like this or should ports/96293 be committed? (Or was it 
never OK and I just misremembered?)


Dejan