From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 25 9: 6:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B796937B42C for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #6) id 153K6y-000Iqk-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:06:48 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4PG6mi22262; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:06:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:06:47 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing inb()/outb() from devices Message-ID: <20010525170647.B21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20010525164033.A21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010523171539.A43898@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200105250206.f4P26wl39972@billy-club.village.org> <20010525164033.A21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200105251556.f4PFujl42699@billy-club.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200105251556.f4PFujl42699@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:45AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG | Yes, but it does make sense to do that. Some busses you cannot access | the resources until they have been activated. pcmcia comes to mind :-). ah, but of course. :-) Well, then, let me know if my plan is acceptable: I will newbussify all macros, and any inb/outb calls i find that are not inside a probe function. How is that? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message