From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 21 19:10:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04CE106564A for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAD18FC0C for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6LJA7b2036029 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6LJA7BP036028; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 GMT Message-Id: <200907211910.n6LJA7BP036028@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: clemens fischer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/127728: ports/games/freebsd-games doesn't build, and larn(6) segfaults! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: clemens fischer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:10:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/127728; it has been noted by GNATS. From: clemens fischer To: Ulrich Spoerlein Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/127728: ports/games/freebsd-games doesn't build, and larn(6) segfaults! Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:08:28 +0200 > Ulrich Spoerlein: > Hi Clemens, > > please try the attached patch for the freebsd-games port and see if it > fixes the most pressing larn segfaults on 8.0-CURRENT. > > It still segfaults on exit for me, but fixing this with patches upon > patches is not the right way. Well, the problem seemed to be the way gcc stores strings in non-writable memory, so I replaced that part with a proper record structure. your patch is just another patch, so why is it any better than mine? Also, no segfault is acceptable before scores are written to disk. > As for atc, I cannot reproduce this here. Is this still a valid > problem? Sorry, I can't help, because I don't have a working freebsd installation ATM. regards, clemens fischer