Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Oct 2002 01:44:03 -0700
From:      David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
To:        Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Comments on new Linux threading implementation?
Message-ID:  <20021001084403.GA2432@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020930225234.A22216@attbi.com>
References:  <20020930225234.A22216@attbi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>:
> I saw this post on the Linux kernel mailing list which
> describes a major re-write of the POSIX threads implementation
> on Linux:
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0209.2/1075.html
> 
> 
> How does this stuff under Linux compare to the scheduler
> activation type work going on under FreeBSD
> ( http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/threads/ )?

Discussed before:

http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive/2002/freebsd-arch/20020922.freebsd-arch.html

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021001084403.GA2432>