Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:41:12 +0400 From: Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org> To: araujo@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r309078 - head/x11-wm/bbkeys Message-ID: <CAD5bB%2BgmyFb371nfVTR-uQniYXX0WvjhXv9X4zfXdUuYN9zkvg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZheoF6-oA4LdgtCtwFU238QSwr6W5oFcRWtYGBAOPbbhA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201212171018.qBHAIVGO065612@svn.freebsd.org> <CAOfEmZheoF6-oA4LdgtCtwFU238QSwr6W5oFcRWtYGBAOPbbhA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>wrote: > > > 2012/12/17 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> > >> Author: danfe >> Date: Mon Dec 17 10:18:30 2012 >> New Revision: 309078 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/309078 >> >> Log: >> - Trim Makefile header, NOPORTDOCS -> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS >> - Define LICENSE, drop article from COMMENT, small cleanups >> - Augment port description while I am here >> >> Approved by: maintainer (implicit) >> >> > Dear Alexey, > > In my understand this update should have maintainer approvals! > Even that your changes improved it a lot, the maintainer should be > respected, or, the maintainer timeout should be respected. > Why? I don't see any reason against such changes even without maintainers approval. All what Alexey done is our needs as porters. > > Best Regards, > -- > Marcelo Araujo > araujo@FreeBSD.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD5bB%2BgmyFb371nfVTR-uQniYXX0WvjhXv9X4zfXdUuYN9zkvg>