From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 11 06:24:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43313106564A; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-150-251.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E4414F00C; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F36097D.6030804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:23:57 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120201 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <201202110605.q1B65e8h016119@svn.freebsd.org> <1758AEE1-6702-4A90-89D8-4AB81C8A54A5@FreeBSD.org> <4F360855.20108@FreeBSD.org> <896D0D6A-4EFB-41E4-BDD6-944473EBD125@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <896D0D6A-4EFB-41E4-BDD6-944473EBD125@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: You need to recompile libc with new kernel (svn commit: r231506 - in head: . lib/libc/net) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:24:00 -0000 On 02/10/2012 22:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On 11. Feb 2012, at 06:19 , Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 02/10/2012 22:15, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> as the UPDATING message says, if you updated your HEAD between 2011-12-15 and now >>> you need to recompile libc again with the new kernel. If you are updating from >>> outside that window, especially from any STABLE branch, things should be a lot more >>> happy now, which (in addition to make the interface extensible) was the main reason >>> for another breakage in HEAD. >> >> Does this fix the broken ifconfig on new kernel + old world? > > Amongst other things, yes. Awesome, thanks! It bit me again recently, but fortunately I knew the answer already. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/