From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 12 21:55:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970FB16A475 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elrap@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de (fmmailgate02.web.de [217.72.192.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5574113C4D1 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elrap@web.de) Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD24AE2F0E7; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:55:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [84.152.175.12] (helo=freebsdangel.de) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.108 #208) id 1IrhFL-0002TJ-00; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:55:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4738CB99.5000807@web.de> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:54:33 +0100 From: Tino Engel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <2852884D-270A-4879-B960-C10A602E080E@ashleymoran.me.uk> <47387891.2060007@unsane.co.uk> <47387BCA.6080604@foster.cc> <20071112183502.438b44b8@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4738A71A.6060100@chuckr.org> <4738ACDD.50108@u.washington.edu> <4738ADC8.2060005@gmx.de> <4738AEBF.4010109@u.washington.edu> <4738C145.2050601@chuckr.org> <20071112214240.5d3b048a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071112214240.5d3b048a@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: elrap@web.de X-Sender: elrap@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/E04PZ94MYNW7AwYpx0a54nV6f7m58LMaTeR60 kDwXFipI1TQkdyJ4jFGUbTuF+acSg+5S4aoz2zyhJj9VfWWIZm dtzAiS2tM= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with GUI configs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:55:18 -0000 RW schrieb: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:29 -0500 > Chuck Robey wrote: > > >> I hope not. We really need to move this out of being a ports >> buildtime thing. Currently, to build ports in batch either requires >> someone to be chained to the computer, so as to intercept all those >> screens, or to simply agree to install everything, with no inpput >> whatever. >> > > That's not correct, you can run make config-conditional or make > config-recursive anytime you like. > > But not on a portupgrade... I don't want to run config-recursive on the whole ports tree though....