Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:22:18 +0100 From: Jochem Kossen <j.kossen@home.nl> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance Message-ID: <20020221222218.GA11359@jochem.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpheoa7c0o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200202181912.g1IJCGK32122@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218114326.A98974@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202181951.g1IJpip33604@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218153807.E96115@locore.ca> <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020221014909.A13952@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020221221005.A78243@energyhq.homeip.net> <xzpheoa7c0o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> writes: > > Well, if all developers started using p4, things would be easier and work > > better in the long term. p4 is lightyears ahead of cvs, and, from what > > I've read in this thread, developers are not exactly happy with cvs now, > > as it's limitations have become evident. > > Perforce also has limitations. It does a number of things better than > CVS, and a number of things worse. Its main problem, IMHO, is that it > tries to do too much, at the expense of basic functionality. As it seems people are forming a list of cvs alternatives, anyone ever took a look at arch? http://regexps.com/#arch A buddy of mine just mentioned it, and it seemed to fit in this discussion, i don't know it myself though. It's covered under the GPL. Jochem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221222218.GA11359>