From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 21 13:16:13 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D5E106567B;
	Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDD88FC19;
	Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:16:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <485CFF1B.2080500@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:16:11 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
References: <485B7FFC.4040509@FreeBSD.org> <485B884A.70006@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <485B884A.70006@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: execvpe port breakage
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:16:13 -0000

David Xu wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.8.2008062001/deco-3.9_3.log 
>>
>>
>> Can someone please take a look?
>>
>> Kris
>>
> 
> Looks like the application defined its own version of execvpe() ?
> I think we should change name execvpe in our header file to something
> else to avoid conflict.
> 
> David Xu
> 
> 

There are a few others too:

./deco-3.9_3.log
./gdc-0.24_3.log
./ghc-6.8.2_1.log
./hugs98-200609_2.log
./jdk-1.6.0.3p4_2.log

Also sysutils/screen.

We could either patch these, try to alter the prototype of our execvpe 
to match, or rename/hide our version.  I don't know if there is a 
standards-based argument.

Kris