From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 15 05:32:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D341106564A for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (ns1.thought.org [209.180.213.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE47A8FC14 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from [10.47.0.180] (ethos.thought.org [10.47.0.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n3F5XdNV019580; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: Gary Kline To: Steve Bertrand In-Reply-To: <49E51AD7.4060600@ibctech.ca> References: <20090414224141.GA16354@thought.org> <49E51AD7.4060600@ibctech.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Thought Unlimited Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:32:33 -0700 Message-Id: <1239773553.5886.4.camel@ethos.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: from very early this morning... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:32:38 -0000 On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:23 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > [...big snip...] > > > if i've made any sense so far, great! if not,i'm open for > > questions. i'm also open for suggestions on how to alter this > > network configuration. > > > > thanks for reading this far. > > > > gary > > > > > > It might be simplest to replace my firewall and my server with > > low-energy-usage i386 computers; is there a better way? > > What are your requirements for your network ie. are you requiring any > fancy trickery, or is this simply trying to NAT a couple of machines > behind an ADSL connection? No trickery; just trying to run a few desktops and a firewall plus my server. Of course, at the lowest power use, meaning that I'm trying to combine servers, and so on. > Steve