From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 6 21:02:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695DA1065670; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [69.147.83.54]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F4414E1C8; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50709C4A.3030305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 14:02:02 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20121001 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20121005140534.GB61272@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <506F9275.3090106@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080409.GA30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20121006080409.GA30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CHANGE PROPOSAL] Moving WWW from pkg-descr to Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:02:16 -0000 On 10/06/2012 01:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Concerning the bpm, I have removed more old things and useless tests from it > that I have added! I haven't done a line by line count, but even if you're right, that doesn't help when the code you add is so inefficient. For example, you still haven't fixed this mess for PKGCONFIG: .if ${USE_PKGCONFIG:L} == yes USE_PKGCONFIG= build .endif instead of just using: .if ${USE_PKGCONFIG:L} == yes || ${USE_PKGCONFIG:L} == build I pointed that out to you shortly after you committed it in July. And no, don't bother with your typical "send a patch" response. I already told you I'm not going to waste my time sending patches for trivial items to fix your code. > and if people were actively working on switching there ports > to the new option framework then the fallback code could be removed and this > will speed up lots of operations. I have no intention of inflicting the new OPTIONS on my users until it's fully backwards compatible (as you promised on day 1) and bug free for a while. You've only just this week gotten around to fixing command line compatibility, so let's wait and see how that pans out. -- I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what I can do. -- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)