From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 01:04:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A3016A41F for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 01:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nlanza@premodern.org) Received: from dzerzhinsky.premodern.org (dzerzhinsky.dsl.telerama.com [205.201.10.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85843D48 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 01:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nlanza@premodern.org) Received: from [205.201.10.90] (liebot [205.201.10.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by dzerzhinsky.premodern.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8814lGA053193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:04:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from nlanza@premodern.org) Message-ID: <431F8E2D.8090700@premodern.org> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:04:45 -0400 From: Nat Lanza User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <44924.1125814452@phk.freebsd.dk> <431F8CDE.9070801@premodern.org> <20050908010151.GA51599@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050908010151.GA51599@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on dzerzhinsky.premodern.org Cc: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/85503: panic: wrong dirclust using msdosfs in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:04:57 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >>It's not realistic to implement >4G files on a local-disk filesystem >>anytime soon > > > ??? In context, I mean "more than 4 billion files per filesystem, thus requiring a >32bit inode". --nat